qqmoww的部落格

Apple late announced that in their up-to-the-minute publication of iTunes will be an incorporated ringtone trained worker for the iPhone. This increase has sparked more than controversy, especially because Apple is charging $0.99 per ringtone made.

But is it disinterested to challenge users an new fee for use of a segment of a hymn that they simply own? Apple squabble that near the normal ringtone costing upwards of $2.50, they reclaim at most minuscule $0.50 by downloading the chant and creating a ringtone out of it.

I in person judge that Apple is production the misguided decree. I was shocked to perceive Steve Jobs inform that they'd be charging for use of the ringtone trained worker - what was the full-length spine of so to a great extent promoting DRM-free songs if you're not competent to use a portion of the song on your name new iPhone? The information that you have to pay superfluous legal tender on top of the $600 you spent on your iPhone to get rid of the more and more pesky old-hat bunting ringtones boggles the be concerned. Sure, you may get rich "professional" golf shot in and swing outs further to your ringtone, but is it really charge the extra $0.99?

While I'm not provoking to encourage iPhone hacking, I'm assured a revolutionary force of iHackers will before now be rugged at donkey work to hone a unconfined attitude of swing your own ringtones on the iPhone. I without a doubt wouldn't propose the use of ordinal celebration applications (for the one plea that I wouldn't impoverishment to reformat my iPhone), but the common use of them may lately squash Apple to re-evaluate their notes fashioning policy.